home

Return to the Home Page

Return to Planning Commission Minutes Page

Town of Trappe, MD Planning Commission Meeting Minutes

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 21, 2004
7:30 pm.
Trappe Town Hall

The regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting was opened by Chairperson Edgar Harrison and called to order at 7:35 p.m. Planning Commission members present were Mr. Don English, Mr. Don Haring, Mr. Bobby Quidas and Mr. Jerry Adams.

Chairperson Harrison asked for a motion to approve the March minutes. Mr. Bobby Quidas made a motion to approve the March minutes as amended.

Motion was seconded by Mr. Don English. All were in favor with an Aye.

PERMITS ISSUED:
  • T-08-04 – Jennifer Moore – Howell Pt. Road (Parcel 8) New House


  • T-09-04 – Mark Langrell – 3798 Marvel Drive – Fence


  • T-11-04 – William & Phyllis Slaughter – 29559 Timberwind Lane – Shed


  • T-13-04 - Lois Baker - 29410 Maple Avenue - Remove Existing Shed


  • T-14-04 - Lois Baker – 29410 Maple Ave., Shed.
PERMITS PENDING:
  • T-10-04 – Ronald & Kerry Brigerman – 29085 Farms Lane – Pool, Decking & Fence.
Mr. Jerry Adams questioned the fact that there is no limit on minor accessory structures in R-1 or R-2. We need to check with other towns to see what their requirements are. The only controlling factor at this time is the lot coverage.



OLD BUSINESS:

VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN:

Mr. Hall presented a letter from Attorney Booth that described her recommendation for a process to allow a mix of commercial and residential uses in the Village Redevelopment Area. Mr. Hall noted that he agreed with Mrs. Booth’s recommendations. Attorney Booth’s letter recommended amending the Village Overlay Zone to include a new section for a Village Redevelopment Area verses creating a separate Village Redevelopment Plan that could not be enforced.

Mr. Hall explained that the first step would be to decide the boundary of the Village Redevelopment Area and he noted that all of the Design Guidelines recently adopted would apply to the Village Redevelopment Area. In addition, the amendment should include a Land Use Table that would permit most uses in the Village Redevelopment Area by Special Exception. Mr. Hall explained that the Special Exception process would allow for greater community participation with the Board of Appeals and would allow greater control of a project since additional conditions can be added by the Board of Appeals before a project is approved.

Another benefit of the Special Exception process is that the Planning Commission would be able to make their recommendation for approval or denial of a project to the Board of Appeals. During the discussion, Mr. Hall presented two maps showing an aerial view and a parcel view of the Village Overlay Zone. The Planning Commission also reviewed the draft Land Use Table submitted by Mr. Hall.

The Planning Commission expressed their concerns over amending the Village Overlay Zone. Mr. Adams stated that the Village Overlay Zone permits different land uses. Mr. Harrison wanted as little change to the Village Overlay Zone as possible. As the discussion continued, the consensus was not to amend the Village Overlay Zone, but to expand the C-1 zone during the upcoming comprehensive rezoning process. Mr. Harrison noted that the Planning Commission would have to carefully review the uses allowed in the C-1 zone.

Mr. Hall stated that he did not recommend waiting for a comprehensive rezoning. He felt that simply expanding the Euclidian C-1 zone would limit the flexibility and authority the Planning Commission needed to redevelop the village core.

Mr. Adams added that he understands the importance of parking to the success of the Village Redevelopment Area and he would prefer some planning and mapping of potential parking areas even though the Town cannot force someone to provide parking.

Mr. Mark Bower asked if the C-1 zone precluded 2nd story apartments above commercial businesses. Mr. Don Haring expressed his concerns over 2nd story apartments based on his experience in other communities.

Mr. Harrison suggested enlarging the C-1 zone during a comprehensive rezoning instead of amending the Village Overlay Zone to create a village redevelopment area. He suggested carefully reviewing the permitted and special exception land uses allowed in the C-1 zone. All were in favor with an Aye.

EASTSIDE PROJECT STATUS UPDATE - MR. BOB RAUCH:

Mr. Rauch gave a project status update. Mr. Rauch said that they were continuing to work on the formal submittal they plan to submit at the May meeting with the required exhibits and documents.



NEW BUSINESS:

MR. RONALD BRIGERMAN:

Mr. Don English said that Mr. Brigerman presented documentation at the last Town Council meeting to be sent to the Planning Commission for review concerning the size of fencing for a swimming pool. The current Town Zoning Ordinance states that the fence should be 6 ft. Mr. Brigerman feels that 6 ft. is too high and very costly. Mr. English stated that the 2000 International Building Code requires 48” and that he has reviewed the Town Ordinance and believes that 6 ft is too high.

There was a discussion on this issue since last year Cheryl Lewis had asked the same question. Mr. Adams stated that 4 ft. is the minimum height and that he is opposed to always accepting the minimum standards. Mr. Harrison said that he would entertain accepting the 2000 International Building Code of 4 Ft. fences for swimming pools. Attorney Booth said she would prepare a new Ordinance.

Motion was made by Mr. English to make a recommendation the Town Council to delete Ordinance 5-2000 and to amend the fencing height requirement to 48” similar to the International Building Code. Motion was second by Mr. Haring.

Vote:

Quidas – Abstain, Adams – Nay, Harrison – Y, Haring – Y, English - Y

CONCEPT PLAN EARL HALL:

Mr. Frank Hall stated that Mr. Earl Hall was being represented by his agent Mr. Roscoe Brown concerning his parcel of land that included the Farm house on Seymour Drive. Mr. Brown contacted Mr. Frank Hall to determine if his client had enough acreage in the R-1 zone for a subdivision (house included as one). Mr. Frank Hall stated that his response to Mr. Brown was that he had enough acreage for a potential 3 lots but that the location of the farm house and shed, and the lot sizes of other parcels on Seymour Drive would probably limit the subdivision to two lots total including the original lot.

At Mr. Frank Hall’s request, Mr. Brown submitted concept plans proposed by his client Mr. Earl Hall that would also allow room for a new garage. Mr. Frank Hall noted in his staff report that he amended Mr. Earl Hall’s concept plan submittal with several modifications that would create a lot more in character with the La Trappe Heights community. Mr. English stated that he prefers a concept plan that maintains existing front yard setbacks and rear property line alignment similar to the other houses on Seymour Drive.

The Planning Commission reached a consensus that they preferred concept plan Option A with modifications and instructed Mr. Brown that his next step was to hire a surveyor and submit a preliminary plan to the Planning Commission.

LISA SAFFRIN PROPERTY HOWELL POINT ROAD – ANNEXATION:

Mr. Frank Hall said that Ms. Saffrin was interested in having her property annexed into town. The Planning Commission briefly discussed some of the annexation issues with Ms. Saffrin and her brother Mr. Dickie Newcomb. Mr. Hall suggested to Ms. Saffrin that since she did not live in Trappe that she could file a notarized letter authorizing her brother Mr. Dickie Newcomb to speak for her. Mr. Harrison briefly explained to Ms. Saffrin the annexation process which includes a letter to the town requesting annexation, a survey of the property, and a $2,000.00 fee.

PAUL MOORE SUBDIVISON HOWELL POINT ROAD:

Mr. Moore’s current concept plan submitted by C & R Professional Surveyors (Mr. Rob Hughes) showed a 7 lot subdivision with a new road that ends at the western edge of the property. Mr. Hall presented his staff report and noted that Mr. Moore’s project is the first major subdivision since the development moratorium was lifted. Mr. Hall and Mr. English reviewed the plans together against the subdivision ordinance checklist and they identified many issues that still need to be addressed before the subdivision can be approved.

Mr. Hughes acknowledged that this submittal was more of a concept plan review instead of a preliminary plat review. On behalf of Mr. Moore, Mr. Hughes had several questions relating to the amount of Fee-In-Lieu for open space that may be required by the Town Council since the concept plan provides some open space along Howell Point Road, and whether the Fee-In-Lieu would have to be paid for all seven lots since the parcel is currently subdivided into five lots.

The Planning Commission suggested that they like the submittal and they appreciated Mr. Moore’s attempt to address their previous comments regarding lot layout, road design, and number of lots. The Planning Commission stated that they will need to consult with the Town Attorneys about the Fee-In-Lieu questions and that the Town’s consulting engineers may need to review the storm water and road designs. They also noted that bonding may be necessary for the infrastructure improvements. Finally, the Planning Commission agreed with Mr. Moore’s request to name the subdivision Shelby Acres.

Mr. Harrison stated the sketch is generally approved as a Concept Plan with notes and recommendations added and he motioned to approve the sketch as a Concept Plan. All were in favor with an Aye.

ZONING ORDINANCE REWRITE

Mr. Hall stated that he retyped the Zoning Ordinance with recommended corrections identified in brackets since only the Town Council can amend the ordinance.

Motion was made by Mr. English to recommend to the Town Council to accept the retyped Zoning Ordinance with the suggested corrections. Mr. Adams seconded the motion. All were in favor with an Aye.

INFILL REDEVELOPMENT SEMINAR:

Mr. Harrison and Mr. Hall attended a seminar on infill redevelopment and they briefly discussed the contents of the seminar with the rest of the Planning Commission.

DESIGN STANDARDS BROCHURE:

Mr. Hall stated that since the design guidelines ordinance was passed by the Town Council, it is now time to work on the brochure that will graphically depict the design guidelines in pictures and drawings. The brochure is intended as a guide to developers. Mr. Hall noted that he will work closely with Mr. Harrison and Mr. Pete Johnston in developing the brochure.

ANNOUNCEMENTS:
  • Special Trash Pickup – April 30, 2004


  • Episcopal Church Dinner – April 23rd

Respectfully submitted:

____________________
Joedy Cecil Town Clerk

___________________
Approved: Edgar Harrison
Chairperson


Mr. English made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion was seconded by Mr. Adams. The meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m.